[Operators] Future of XMPP Re: The Google issue

Maxim Ignatenko gelraen.ua at gmail.com
Tue Dec 3 23:29:13 UTC 2013

I was talking about server-side implementation because clients won't
work if server is not talking to Google's or Apple's servers to
actually send the notification. Without widespread support in poplar
XMPP servers there's no point in implementing such support in mobile

Pushing some other notifications over XMPP is entirely unrelated thing
and I'm not talking about it here.

On 3 December 2013 18:34, Aryo Sandiyudo <asandiyudo at mayplaces.com> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Maxim, I am a little confused by your statement. At first time you mention about push notification at level "server implementation" but then you give reference to the push notification at level "client implementation". Well, I know that these two things are related but it will require huge costs and time-consuming to implement it in the real world.
> As for you to know that our Mail2XMPP push notification can work well with any XMPP/Jabber client (web-based, a desktop or even mobile client). Thus expected to be more flexible in its use without having to perform a specific mobile application development for different OS. Look you don't have to take my word for it, just create an acoount on MayPlaces (free) and see for yourself :-)
> - -- -
> aRyo S
> http://mayplaces.com
> 0x6A727933.asc - https://db.tt/aht0U2Wq
> On Dec 4, 2013, Maxim Ignatenko <gelraen.ua at gmail.com> wrote:
>>I mean this:
>>Without this any XMPP client has to keep TCP connection open, which
>>drains battery faster than it should.
>>On 3 December 2013 02:26, Aryo Sandiyudo <asandiyudo at mayplaces.com>
>>> I do not know what exactly the definition of push notification that
>>you mean, but for your information that in http://mayplaces.com we have
>>already implement push notifications for new mail (Mail to XMPP).
>>> And as far as i know there is already an XMPP client that provides
>>push notifications for offline message though to use the ad-free
>>version you have to spend a few dollars.
>>> - -- -
>>> aRyo S
>>> http://mayplaces.com
>>> On Dec 3, 2013, Maxim Ignatenko <gelraen.ua at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On 28 November 2013 12:44, Solomon Peachy <pizza at shaftnet.org> wrote:
>>>>> Without Google, XMPP (S2S) simply doesn't have enough of a mass
>>>>> to be viable, IMO.  The mass markey simply doesn't care about
>>>>> "quality".  (Witness every mobile-messaging-app-du-jour overnight
>>>>> up with more users than non-google S2S-enabled XMPP..)
>>>>That's because there is no:
>>>>1) push notifications support for Android/iOS in popular server
>>>>2) decent mobile client
> Version: APG v1.0.9
> iQFHBAEBAgAxBQJSniQuKhxBcnlvIFNhbmRpeXVkbyA8YXNhbmRpeXVkb0BtYXlw
> bGFjZXMuY29tPgAKCRAP0JnXanJ5M5azB/9uZAvNefhJqinZ3WxdvLPQxvmVuLVc
> P2oncD0nlkFz+8K0bu9pgYBiR7PBMeSNtYAx71yqg/WomWnpA4T3MydiS3sxvB80
> VH+kAOItgPNi30Bf3VzmggUUJ/W4SbdhUq+VWPbvj12R3OnCtw0wAVSRtrYL90q/
> YxzeqQj2LNL0lNTGsbRzkCS1WAw161YGKzmv9WB4sWAP0+wXH4KG29uD3pG3hCck
> mB91YrthFP+L21kXOvNl+iZq3QU3rM/XCwGoexx2XkadylI2DrSIoyekLRkf6uUv
> m1hbnVuVnR4HaytG2dCBI+pJPeVrJ2sCVlv6bormtg9nML8D0b6Qmyj9
> =bt7W

Best regards,

More information about the Operators mailing list