[Operators] Future of XMPP Re: The Google issue

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Dec 4 14:21:49 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/4/13 6:56 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 04.12.2013 14:05, schrieb Ralph Meijer:
> 
>> Alternatively, it makes total sense to use a different protocol
>> on PANs and/or LANs and then bridge it to XMPP for WAN transport.
>> For example, Peter Waher is working on bridging MQTT and XMPP,
>> and MQTT also has a special profile for sensor networks based on
>> non-TCP/IP settings, like Zigbee.
> 
> I would prefer to make a clean cut and to develop something like
> XMPP 2.0

Folks, this list is for operators of XMPP services. If we're going to
design XMPP 2.0, let's please do it on the standards at xmpp.org list:

http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=KwlC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Operators mailing list