[Operators] Future of XMPP Re: The Google issue
pizza at shaftnet.org
Fri Dec 6 12:26:45 UTC 2013
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:59:53AM +0100, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Alexander Holler:
> > - machines should be able to communicate without the need for a server
> That is one reason why I think that interoperability with P2P standards
> makes sense.
Sure, that sounds like a great idea, but... how do you discover said
user's IP address without the use of a server somewhere? Then add the
joy of multiple layers of shifting NAT into the mix for some real
IMO "P2P interoperability" sounds like a barely-thought-out solution in
search of an ill-defined problem.
I could expand on my reasoning if there's interest, otherwise it's
Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org
Delray Beach, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Operators