[Operators] google abandoning XMPP??

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed May 22 15:16:36 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 5/22/13 9:15 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On the other hand, not needing to interoperate with Google Talk
>> might free us to more aggressively work on network security
>> improvements. I say let's take this as an opportunity rather than
>> a disappointment.
> 
> +1. I wonder what the correlation between "gtalk doesn't do TLS"
> and "businesses don't allow federation with gtalk" is.

I suspect that the correlation is very low.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=IR1a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Operators mailing list