[Operators] Google post on Cipher selection

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Nov 15 18:45:04 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/15/13 11:41 AM, Simon Tennant wrote:
> Wherein they completely don't follow their own advice:
> 
> http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.de/2013/11/a-roster-of-tls-cipher-suites-weaknesses.html
>
> 
> 
> vs:
> 
> http://xmpp.net/result.php?domain=google.com&type=client#ciphers

Well, currently jabber.org doesn't score so well on the cipher suites,
either, although we'll fix that soon (at least before the first test
day on January 4th).

But I'll bring this to the attention of some folks at Google...

> Have a nice weekend everyone.

:-)

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJShmuwAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pJkQQAKtOQ78ceVBzFLtDC/8ZnJhC
5zvP1P4MpbwuFqe9PVmJP+/L6CAujGKmmZEB2YbGEcgxnky1fYHafevM6LriTtqB
KJ4H1aqT31UDlJZZyq5+HZdWjC7dWsDM9ma1IfHucvldIMAt7r6ypuv96pc5z/wZ
B/SwrTFl/T1qvCEHqJAMYG5bhAaKZDwS1S/1yI+hSJVx51YzJIMjTeO94NH4aoGh
q3pQbGpt4Wwmo34zgCUH7o+dKSPV+VmmbIbqHLclhYAArol9XLrsgo6WEiyPdXEE
X5z4mgfyjLoEcCdOyxlTAsFr9TeMzoTTE8A7WW5T7cqcllLdVPiRQuSdUsElZn80
iR/YU7I2ZDEpg9Ksk4l0MD+N71jhS3okopcvDNpRjZ9z2OwhYnNdR5vUDhSNOIan
F+ity+nXhHrlhba3qMebppGuC4G0wIN21v9COEvuDheLBuXLp/gZ8qViQIlT+A3V
+7XQrDZzZO9Or3ddkpTRqbKqaoAMqkLJ6efMRlHI6vUZprI0Maq8Curm1ZKdWV7D
IkoYpoD4ZiQxTAgDmQ54pjplXmrJGyFkm/N1exI7PPuwxR8nAqYosxE3Cu4D7FYu
m1pvSHUQlV1LQVNxuePppdJvq0SaDFguaa06NtSCrfqwe/b77vrBADPUdPP+T5Ne
6rzro/Ux1+iuu9T1XaOi
=psiH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Operators mailing list