[Operators] transitive federations?
ralphm at ik.nu
Wed Aug 20 19:39:09 UTC 2014
On 2014-08-20 16:49, Hiers, David wrote:
> Marketing came up with a crazy idea that needed killing.
> The one sliver of RFC 6120 that gave any hope life to this horrid beast was:
> 126.96.36.199.2. The domainpart of the JID contained in the stanza's 'to'
> attribute MUST match the FQDN of the receiving server (or any
> validated domain thereof)...
> One could read "any validated domain" quite broadly, so I wanted to check that I wasn’t missing anything.
Your marketing department reads RFCs? Wow!
More information about the Operators