[Operators] Fwd: [xmpp] Position Paper on Strengthening XMPP

Marco Cirillo maranda at lightwitch.org
Thu Jan 16 00:31:05 UTC 2014


Il 15/01/2014 19:50, Peter Saint-Andre ha scritto:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> FYI.
>
>
> - -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [xmpp] Position Paper on Strengthening XMPP
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:49:42 -0700
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>
> To: XMPP <xmpp at ietf.org>
>
> I have submitted an initial version of a position paper about
> strengthening XMPP for the W3C/IAB workshop to be held before IETF 89:
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-strint-workshop-xmpp/
>
> https://www.w3.org/2014/strint/
>
> The document is a bit of a stub, so I would love to receive some
> feedback in the next 48 hours. I'll then submit a revised I-D for
> formal consideration by the workshop committee.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS1th9AAoJEOoGpJErxa2pQOQQAKDt0EHf5v7FxSm80L9zhvD0
> Vk3FzBueKipYNLcjEUlccMZozVRORs0npXfs+KBv/tVUT4AXCXvTWznAT70kwIIf
> qq5XyJmGb6xIsf5taej2qGTPvlYS//XbivcKKL3K0gSXgO6j4EcYLb7+Yl8YudML
> PPl22VZQ0Vm0ZxNyjUZOlDJhIIFQZZPaB5GKmlhR/6opIyV6dh41U+bhPphJwvd2
> jxjPZUb9oLi+u+7aVQ+qdF5TrvQTsMCdP3tQiHCKaHsNKJ/BEuhf4JFByu5QfJDV
> xsYWY6Z0+06Z/bJMlQ0qXOEoBPPVlM+52+JIY4sbYTBCNOfNd8F1Z1Ritm3Joexl
> 7rOh8rRAZQ6S/SX78TYM9JHk24zPV8JeNiflSe/KvscVdZAymN+4aqjrmTd6LPmr
> i2kDCC66jqSg1mqQp0l3sBHe9J3CMbGtRngY+fqcTXp5INHTPtbCuyUaA5yNDg6w
> woXi/R2NQGUTRZrH4KGGH6//PI4fsxKRM6bksGctfwqF+69cnHsg/MMWUtcFKqNS
> oeZGmBfbjSLfgfhffe5O35htTGZm8LI/dSJaPAOlE+CnzZDT++tia8DE0M6z2f0P
> czWKLqSf2IbjTh83CISWLhctzB0t+s858fed7JH4KJDEgapzjzd1MioDzgV9HZP4
> POXA21Y5vlnKXPFelagA
> =0U35
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Sounds good,
I'd mark in a more incisive way how OTR doesn't have a proper protocol 
flow at all xmpp wise (everything ranging from negotiation to actual 
message encryption is done into the message body), contrary to the 
mentioned others.

-- 

*Marco Cirillo*
/LW.Org/LW.Org IM Owner & Head Developer/
/Metronome IM Project Mantainer/Developer/
/Jappix Mantainer/Developer/
http://lightwitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/operators/attachments/20140116/6fb7e76e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4512 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/operators/attachments/20140116/6fb7e76e/attachment.bin>


More information about the Operators mailing list