[Operators] Operators Digest, Vol 84, Issue 9

Daniele Ricci daniele.athome at gmail.com
Sat Mar 14 12:42:08 UTC 2015

Thanks John.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 1:00 PM,  <operators-request at xmpp.org> wrote:
> Subject: Re: [Operators] SOA record on non-2nd level domain
> Message-ID: <55030ED1.8050207 at cha0s-studio.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Unless the 3rd level domain is delegated to other nameservers there is
> no need for a SOA record on it.
> On 13/3/2015 5:41 ??, Daniele Ricci wrote:
>> Hello operators,
>> I have a SRV record for XMPP set up for beta.kontalk.net.
>> Do you think a SOA record is mandatory also for the 3rd level domain
>> itself? Or is it maybe advisable to do so?
>> Thank you


More information about the Operators mailing list