[standards-jig] Invisibility Support in Jabber
theo at theoretic.com
Fri Aug 9 03:11:45 UTC 2002
Ben Schumacher wrote:
> Thanks Mike. People always seem to get a little jumpy when you start
> suggesting anything that changes the way Jabber deals with presence. I'm
> glad you appreciate the idea.
> Part of me was being a little sarcastic, as well. I have a tendancy to do
> that... which isn't so well conveyed in email messages.
/me thinks how much good use of emoticons would solve that problem....
You know, for someone who hates emoticons, I'm becomming awfully
relentless about them :-) Damn that jdev thread from so long ago, damn
/\ Adam Theo, Age 23, Tallahassee FL USA
//\\ Email & Jabber: theo at theoretic.com
// \\ Pager: (850) 709 7738
// || \\ Theoretic Solutions: http://www.theoretic.com
|| "Building Ideas by Bringing them Together"
|| Jabber Protocol: http://www.jabber.org
|| "The Next Generation Communications Protocol"
|| "A Free-Market Socialist Patriotic American Buddhist"
More information about the Standards