[Standards-JIG] XHTML further simplification

Trejkaz Xaoza trejkaz at xaoza.net
Tue Sep 21 21:56:38 UTC 2004

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 03:10, Rachel Blackman wrote:
> It's lovely to discuss the ideal semantics, the proper way to do
> design.  From the standpoint of purely a discussion of XHTML1 grammar,
> many of these points are good ones.  Is Joe Q. User going to care about
> this?  All they're going to want is that if they paste in text to their
> input window -- yes, even if it has two line breaks between a bit of
> text -- that it gets sent.

If the text comes from some other program, that's probably fine.  But I 
thought the use of XHTML-IM was for simple formatting, not for pasting 
quantities of text from other applications into the Jabber client.  Either 
way, if the other program had two line breaks, then the other program is the 
one with the broken semantics... so it's not really our problem at that 

> And they likely don't care if it's <br/> or whatnot, behind the scenes. :)

They might care about the side effects.  What will be our excuse if a user 
tries to right align just one paragraph in their message and the entire 
message right aligns, due to there only being one semantic paragraph?


             Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz at xaoza.net>
          Web site: http://xaoza.net/trejkaz/
         Jabber ID: trejkaz at jabber.xaoza.net
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20040922/a4d534c6/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list