[Standards-JIG] Re: CALL FOR FEEDBACK: JEP-0060

Jean-Louis Seguineau jean-louis.seguineau at laposte.net
Wed May 24 16:22:42 UTC 2006

This is an equally good idea, Matt. I know you guys have already started
along this path, with a good "pub-sub" starter. Why not bring it under the
JSF umbrella at some point?


-----Original Message-----
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:06:12 -0500
From: "Matt Tucker" <matt at jivesoftware.com>
Subject: RE: [Standards-JIG] Re: CALL FOR FEEDBACK: JEP-0060
To: "Jabber protocol discussion list" <standards-jig at jabber.org>
	<E1F190DAC247C64FAA46B38316FA151D03FAF63D at EX-101.mail.navisite.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Hey all,

I agree that JEP-0060 is large. :) However, it's not overly complex and
the detail is necessary to remove ambiguity (1.8 is also much better
than 1.7). I would suggest that instead of trying to help client authors
at the JEP level that time would be better spent creating a more
client-friendly tutorial. It could include lots of examples and gloss
over many of the details that are necessary in the JEP. Those of us that
work on client API libraries also need to take on the burden of making
pubsub easy to understand and use for client authors.


More information about the Standards mailing list