[Standards-JIG] Behaviour when sending a message to a negativepriority resource
hildjj at gmail.com
Wed Sep 20 22:50:14 UTC 2006
On Sep 20, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Nolan Eakins wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>> So, there's a bot and a user at the same bare jid, with different
>> resources? That seems like a confusing approach. If it's a presence
>> probe of some kind, it shouldn't need to respond to messages. If
>> it's a
>> normal-style bot, it should have its own identity.
> I can see such a situation popping up with a calendar app. I have it
> bound to "me at semanticgap.com/calendar", but since I don't ever want
> chat messages going to it I place it with a negative priority. In
> such a
> case, I'll still want it to receive updates contained in message
> and possibly issue message based commands to it: "add 10:00 AM
This is completely possible. You can always direct a message a
message to a resource, even if that resource is negative priority.
It's just not eligible for being "most available", when a message is
sent to the bare jid.
More information about the Standards