[Standards] mobile optimizations (was: Re: DevCon report)

Fabio Forno fabio.forno at gmail.com
Wed Feb 27 17:53:38 UTC 2008


On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:

>  Yes, we have roster pushes so it seems like a good idea to use them (in
>  general I think we should make intelligent use of everything we've
>  already defined, such as presence and rosters and roster pushes and so
>  on -- other real-time communication technologies don't have these
>  features at the base level, so it's to our advantage to use them). I
>  think that something like what you suggest might work well.
>
>  Also, before the devcon Dave Cridland mentioned that he didn't like the
>  XEP-0150 approach but at the devcon we somehow didn't hear from him on
>  this topic, so perhaps he could weigh in with his ideas here.

In the next days I'm short in time for helping in authoring the XEP,
but at least I can prepare the raw XML samples for handling diffs with
roster pushses

>  >>  - compression
>  >
>  > Under this topic nobody really seems ready to try the binary path
>
>  Yes, so it seemed. Pedro Melo mentioned some further thoughts along
>  these lines at dinner one night, so he and I might work on a spec for
>  that. Right, Pedro? ;-)

Oh yeah, I remember too. That will be a breakthrough in XML technology... ;)

-- 
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: ff at jabber.bluendo.com



More information about the Standards mailing list