[Standards] XEP-0301 Real-Time Text: Unicode normalization, bidirectional, right-to-left text, etc. -- Comments needed

Mark Rejhon markybox at gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 23:10:38 UTC 2012

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>wrote:

> > A minor edit to to clarify this for multiple characters forming one
> > glyph, is to add "incompletely formed glyphs" to the list in the
> > paranthesis.  Would that make sense?
> Do you mean multiple code points forming one character? I still find the
> use of the term 'glyph' confusing here and would prefer to leave it out
> if possible, because it doesn't seem that we're really talking about
> "The actual, concrete image of a glyph representation having been
> rasterized or otherwise imaged onto some display surface." I think it's
> best if RTT talks about characters and code points.

Yes -- that is what I meant.

I'll replace the word glyph with character.  The problem is I am trying to
be consistent with what "character" means.  RFC6365 has multiple
interpretations for the word "character", too.  Is it a code point?  Is it
a displayable character?  Is it the 'char' data type (which can be 1, 2 or
4 bytes each depending on platform)?   Therefore, I like to avoid using the
word "character" outside the context of a Unicode code point, this is how
XEP-0301 defines a character as.

However, I've now removed the word "glyph" from the document.

Mark Rejhon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20120703/e53d438d/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list