[Standards] Call for Experience: XEP-0198: Stream Management
flo at geekplace.eu
Fri Feb 14 09:19:46 UTC 2020
On 14.02.20 10:13, Georg Lukas wrote:
> * Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu> [2020-02-13 21:14]:
>> With the advent of WebSockets and QUIC around the corner, we shouldn't
>> miss the opportunity to allow stream resumption over different
>> transports (TCP, BOSH, WebSocket, QUIC, …).
> Indeed, this is one historical quirk of 0198 that needs to be fixed,
> specifically the `location` element in
> There even was a short thread about this element back in 2017:
Thanks for the pointer. :)
> However, I don't see a way to address this problem without bumping 0198.
I do (in case you are talking about a namespace bump): Compatible
clients would just tell their service which transport bindings they
support and the service responds with the per-transport location
Also note that clients may choose to simply omit this information if
they are fine with performing an opportunistic resumption which
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards