Hello Eelco, I discussed this with colleagues that are more active in semweb topics and they had the suggestion to reuse more existing formats for serialization. See attached an example using RDF/XML that also shows how a GeoSPARQL query could be expressed in XML (using SWRL rules). What do you think? Best regards, Johannes
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: IOT [mailto:iot-bounces@xmpp.org] Im Auftrag von Cramer, E.R. (Eelco) Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Februar 2015 13:00 An: XMPP in the Internet of Things Betreff: Re: [IOT] Semantic searches in registry
Hi,
I've updated the document on https://servicelab.github.io/iot-discovery.html in an attempt to solve issues that I was still having with this proposal.
On 05 Feb 2015, at 14:19, Cramer, E.R. (Eelco) <Eelco.Cramer@tno.nl> wrote:
What I do not like yet is:
- What is still missing is some way to 'discover' the ontology that is supported by the registry.
I've updated the'Determining support' paragraph with a method to discover namespaces.
https://servicelab.github.io/iot-discovery.html#support
- That there is a 'default' namespace for properties that cannot be set by the sender of the message. I would probably like to have a way that a 'default' can be provided by the sender. Maybe an attribute 'defaultns' in the parent elements or something like that.
I added a 'defaultns' attribute to the parent element of 'property' elements that must be used to set a default namespace for the properties.
What do you guys think?
Cheers, Eelco This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.
_______________________________________________ IOT mailing list IOT@xmpp.org http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/iot