[Standards] Request to process/review two submitted Jingle ProtoXEPs

Hello, I have submitted two related Jingle ProtoXEPs: 1. Jingle T.140 / RTT 2. Jingle Location Could someone from the XEP Editors / Council, or someone with Jingle experience, help process and review these submissions? Both ProtoXEPs are based on implementation work in Teletyptel 2.0 alpha. The software is not production-ready yet, but we have running code and practical test results. The goal is to explore accessible total conversation over XMPP with audio, video, real-time text and optional location sharing. The main review areas are: - correct Jingle session design - whether the proposed features should be separate Jingle contents or session metadata - compatibility with existing Jingle/WebRTC clients - relationship to T.140, RFC 4103 and XEP-0080 - fallback behavior when the peer does not support the feature - security and privacy considerations - whether the split into two ProtoXEPs is correct I would appreciate help moving these submissions through the correct XMPP Standards Foundation process. Kind regards, Edward Tie Tiedragon