Request to process/review two submitted Jingle ProtoXEPs
Hello, I have submitted two related Jingle ProtoXEPs: 1. Jingle T.140 / RTT 2. Jingle Location Could someone from the XEP Editors / Council, or someone with Jingle experience, help process and review these submissions? Both ProtoXEPs are based on implementation work in Teletyptel 2.0 alpha. The software is not production-ready yet, but we have running code and practical test results. The goal is to explore accessible total conversation over XMPP with audio, video, real-time text and optional location sharing. The main review areas are: - correct Jingle session design - whether the proposed features should be separate Jingle contents or session metadata - compatibility with existing Jingle/WebRTC clients - relationship to T.140, RFC 4103 and XEP-0080 - fallback behavior when the peer does not support the feature - security and privacy considerations - whether the split into two ProtoXEPs is correct I would appreciate help moving these submissions through the correct XMPP Standards Foundation process. Kind regards, Edward Tie Tiedragon
Le lundi 1 juin 2026, 05:12:53 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Edward Tie via Standards a écrit :
Hello,
I have submitted two related Jingle ProtoXEPs:
1. Jingle T.140 / RTT 2. Jingle Location
Could someone from the XEP Editors / Council, or someone with Jingle experience, help process and review these submissions? [SNIP]
Hi Edward, thank you for your contribution ! The Editor (Daniel) has probably seen this message and it will go through Council where we will review it. It takes usually between few days to 2 weeks to go council meeting, then 2 weeks for the vote. I think that all Council members have experience with Jingle, and anyway technical review is mainly done on standard@ with the wider community. Best, Goffi
On 5/31/26 9:12 PM, Edward Tie via Standards wrote:
Hello,
I have submitted two related Jingle ProtoXEPs:
1. Jingle T.140 / RTT
Have you looked at XEP-0301? https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0301.html See especially §9.1 (and note that the reference to draft-ietf-stox-core should be updated to RFC 7247). Peter
participants (3)
-
Edward Tie -
Goffi -
Peter Saint-Andre