Hi,
XEP-0312 is not needed at all, we have MAM and we get notifications for any
change in a pubsub node (if we are subscribed of course). I actually think
that XEP-0312 should be obsoleted.
I'm known for being a pubsub advocate, but pubsub brings out of the boxes end-
to-end encryption, and indeed we can roll-it out immediately.
However, I'm not strictly opposed to the roster with extension options either,
but we need to have end-to-end encryption for metadata not directly needed by
the server (i.e.; everything but JID and presence subscription). And I'm
afraid too that this can take years.
Best,
Goffi
Le mercredi 12 novembre 2025, 19:58:00 heure normale d’Europe centrale Philipp
Hörist a écrit :
Hi,
I think we need a list of JIDs where we can store data per JID.
What i would expect for this list is
- It can contain any JID
- Notifications on changes of single items
- Version support, i want to be able to only request the latest changes
since
version XX
Option 1:
Extending the Roster and put also group chats in it
- Seems to have everything we need
- Historically clients expect no group chats in the roster, even though not
strictly disallowed by the RFC. (At least i did not find anything). If
backwards compat is a goal, this is probably not a good option
- Takes probably years to role out because of explicit
server support needed
- Clients would need to implement fallbacks for missing server support for
years
or forever depending if all servers adapt this or not -> This brings us
to a chicken-egg problem, as clients have an incentive not implement before
broad server support
Option 2:
Splitting the data between Roster and Bookmarks
- Complexity pushed to clients to merge different stores with different
capabilities
- Pubsub versioning would be nice (XEP-0312), how good
is this supported?
Its not strictly a requirement just an optimization
- Use cases like very natural follow ups like, define
a order between pinned
chats probably complex to implement if data split across
multiple stores
- Takes probably years to role out because of explicit
server support needed
- Clients would need to implement fallbacks for missing server support for
years
or forever depending if all servers adapt this or not -> This brings us
to a chicken-egg problem, as clients have an incentive not implement before
broad server support
>
> Option 3:
> Using only Pubsub
>
> - No server support needed, clients could immediately role out support
- Pubsub versioning would be nice (XEP-0312), how good
is this supported?
Its not strictly a requirement just an optimization
Regards
Philipp
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- standards(a)xmpp.org
To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave(a)xmpp.org