(a) Markup to the body, that has the purpose to
indicate that a
part of
the body is referring to a user or a group of users
(b) Some indication that the message should have some sort of
priority
to a user or a group of users
In the direct mention case, I don't think we really wrnt to allow one
without the other.
Who is "we"? I certainly want to do it and do so regularly in Slack.
You mention people without any indication in the body that you mentioned
them in Slack?? How?
And if we use
occupant id the idea of cross-room mentions becomes not
possible. I'm not sure what the use case for those is but if we wand
that I suppose we should use URI.
The ProtoXEP also allows for mentioning people by JID.
This email thread has already pretty much had everyone including the
original author and the ProtoXEP author saying that will be removed. I
forgot it was still in the published draft.
I'm very much open to also mention people by URI
(allowing for mentioning
of non-XMPP people, via e.g. tel:, mailto: and acct: URI).
Right. Which is what the existing refrences XEP would already allow (with
the small, previously-discussed edit to not restrict the URI on mentions to
URIs of bare JIDs)