Piling on to express support for non-GitHub options. XSF related pulls
is more or less the only reason I'm still on GitHub.
I have it on my bucket list to set up a "sign in with XMPP" option for
Forgejo and then pitch in to help the XSF host our own instance,
hopefully with federation implemented by that time...
...but until that distant future I'd be happy with Codeberg (or an
email-based flow).
~Badr
On 27/08/25 8:58 pm, Schimon Jehudah wrote:
I would want to add that I have a strong desire to
collaborate over the
XSF repositories, yet I am currently very reluctant to do so because of
where it is currently hosted at.
So the mentioned services be reasonable for me to begin to collaborate.
Schimon
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:15:28 +0000
Elle <elle+xmpp-standards(a)weathered-steel.dev> wrote:
On the
other side, I do acknowledge that using a CI-based system for
contributions has its advantage. Therefore, a change which mentions
that we also accept contributions via Github, outlining the
existence of a CI there, would be acceptable to me.
Codeberg exists :) As well as
Sourcehut.
My org has moved all of our projects over to Codeberg, and the
experience has been great (aside from the AI scrapebots plaguing the
internet). Their hosted Woodpecker CI is also pretty easy to
configure, with an option to host your own CI. Federation is also in
the works, so a self-hosted Forgejo instance would be able to sync up
with contributors on Codeberg.
Anyway, thank you for keeping the email-based workflow intact.
All the best
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- standards(a)xmpp.org
To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave(a)xmpp.org