[Standards] Re: [Board] Board meeting info + voting

Piling on to express support for non-GitHub options. XSF related pulls is more or less the only reason I'm still on GitHub. I have it on my bucket list to set up a "sign in with XMPP" option for Forgejo and then pitch in to help the XSF host our own instance, hopefully with federation implemented by that time...

...but until that distant future I'd be happy with Codeberg (or an email-based flow). ~Badr On 27/08/25 8:58 pm, Schimon Jehudah wrote: > I would want to add that I have a strong desire to collaborate over > the XSF repositories, yet I am currently very reluctant to do so > because of where it is currently hosted at. > > So the mentioned services be reasonable for me to begin to > collaborate. > > Schimon > > On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:15:28 +0000 > Elle <elle+xmpp-standards(a)weathered-steel.dev> wrote: > >>> On the other side, I do acknowledge that using a CI-based system >>> for contributions has its advantage. Therefore, a change which >>> mentions that we also accept contributions via Github, outlining >>> the existence of a CI there, would be acceptable to me. >> Codeberg exists :) As well as Sourcehut. >> >> My org has moved all of our projects over to Codeberg, and the >> experience has been great (aside from the AI scrapebots plaguing >> the internet). Their hosted Woodpecker CI is also pretty easy to >> configure, with an option to host your own CI. Federation is also >> in the works, so a self-hosted Forgejo instance would be able to >> sync up with contributors on Codeberg. >> >> Anyway, thank you for keeping the email-based workflow intact. >> >> All the best >> > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list -- standards(a)xmpp.org > To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave(a)xmpp.org