On 13/06/2025 13.08, Guus der Kinderen wrote:
Ah, yes, that seems very relevant, thank you!
As RFC 6120 does not describe "presence sessions", it doesn't describe
"Available Resources" either (as those are closely related to presence).
That's all in RFC 6121. In that reasoning, it makes sense to look back
at RFC 6120 to find specifications related to "Connected
Resources" (rather than "Available Resources".
Two things do not sit well with me:
* The usage of the term "active resource" in RFC 6121, which appears
to be an artifact of RFC 3920/3921. I believe that term should not
be used at all in RFC 6121.
* The section titles in RFC 6121 suggest that specifications are
provided for "Connected Resources", which they do not appear to do
at all.
Would it be appropriate to suggest editorial changes to the RFC, in an
attempt to remove some ambiguity?
Yes, please do so. An RFC errata record will be very helpful once a new
revision of the RFCs is on its way.
- Flow