Hi Matthew,
Le mardi 31 mars 2026, 13:20:57 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Matthew Wild a
écrit :
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 at 12:09, Marvin W. via Standards
<standards(a)xmpp.org> wrote:
[SNIP]
I agree we are far from "everything in one specification", but I think
there is a balance to strike between having every little feature in
individual XEPs, and having everything related to, say, archive
management, in one place. MUC is suffering from the effects of the
"small bolted on XEPs" approach right now, and it makes it a pain for
implementers to figure out what's what.
[SNIP]
Thanks for the feature proposal, it would be indeed a nice addition.
I do agree with Marvin and I think that it should go to a new XEP.
Please note that we have keywords that can now be specified in XEPs, you can
add a `MAM` one, and it will be easy to figure out which XEPs are related to
MAM. It's even better to have it in separated XEPs, as we then have metrics
such as the number of implementer, and we can easily find existing
implementations to test a new one.
Best,
Goffi