JHildebrand at jabber.com
Thu Jul 18 11:47:10 CDT 2002
Hm. You're right. I missed that one. I was under the assumption that the
main thing people were worried about were the examples, though. There is a
caveat at the end of that paragraph that takes away any assumptions of this
protocol's usability in this space, but I agree the entire paragraph could
be axed and not affect the JEP one way or the other.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Lin [mailto:mikelin at MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:11 AM
> To: council at jabber.org
> Subject: RE: [Council] JEP-0020
> > So, nearly 2 months ago, any "references to security and
> > encryption" were removed.
> Can't help being trite about this: please kindly re-read the second
> paragraph of the current version of the JEP. Thanks!
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
More information about the Council