[Council] proto-JEP: Stream Acks
temas at box5.net
Tue Aug 10 14:06:09 CDT 2004
I second this objection, and agree with all of LW's comments. I'd add
the following commentary:
Why would the enabling and pinging even need to be top level? Plus,
this seems to do 3 things in one JEP, acks, pinging, and throttling
(buried in there quickly). Could we pick a focus, if we have to move
On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:32 PM, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
> I object to this JEP for a couple of reasons:
> 1) It introduces a couple of new top-level stanzas.
> 2) It does not attempt to reuse anything that is already defined
> [other than XMPP-Core].
> From my perusal, it would seem AMP (or an extension to AMP) would be a
> reasonable approach.
> - LW
More information about the Council