[Foundation] June 13 Foundation Text Conference Agenda
iainshigeoka at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 13 11:00:31 CDT 2001
At 11:17 AM 6/13/2001 -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>I think it's a bit early for a JAM JIG but there's probably enough
>interest in it to justify forming that group.
>I was just talking with Dizzy and Jack Erwin (a developer at jabber.com)
>and we definitely see a more immediate need for a JIG that will define the
>format for Jabber IDs. Right now the JID format (allowable characters,
>length, etc.) is undefined (or at best a bit loose), and that's a problem.
>A JID-JIG isn't as glamorous as a JAM-JIG, but it's quite necessary. :)
Do we really need a JIG for it? Isn't this something that the Standards
jig can/should handle? There are surrounding issues even regarding the
most fundamental standard (the JID) that would probably best be handled as
a coordinated standards effort.
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Members