[Foundation] Bootstrapping the Foundation

DJ Adams dj.adams at pobox.com
Fri Jun 15 02:13:17 CDT 2001

On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 04:19:05PM -0400, Rich Braman - Audiencebank wrote:
> Why were SOAP/XML-RPC and other types of messages (other than text) left out
> of the JIGS? Will these become JEPS? There were a number of other JIGS
> mentioned at the first meeting that are no longer there as well.

Hi Rich

I was about to suggest a SOAP/XML-RPC (or more generically 'payload') JIG
but then noticed the JAM JIG. I'm way behind in the JAM discussions, but
am assuming (for now) that this subject (carrying distinct XML-based payloads
in Jabber) can be seen as a subset of the JAM initiative - as there's a 
common set of issues. 

(I've brained dumped some of my questions / observations on the issues 
around carrying XML payloads here (start reading from the bottom):
http://www.quicktopic.com/7/H/JiPwsKWxECX9 )

So (not being up to date with the JAM mailing list) I'm assuming that we
can talk about payloads in the JAM JIG, bearing in mind that we should try
to limit the initial number of JIGs and then expand if necessary, rather
than the other way round (look what happened to all those different 
mailing lists originally listed on the mailman pages). 

Comments anyone?


More information about the Members mailing list