[Foundation] jabber.com for president

Al Sutton al at alsutton.com
Fri Jun 29 00:45:16 CDT 2001


Jer,

I'd like to contrubite to the security group. I've worked as a seniro
analyst for seucirty for one of the top 5 american banks, I've written
cryptographic routines to extend the Cryptix Java libraries to use the new
PGP format.

Would it be possible for me to do get involved?

Al.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremie" <jeremie at jabber.org>
To: <members at jabber.org>
Cc: <council at jabber.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation] jabber.com for president


>
> > yeah, have the council members voted on the JIGs yet? Come on :)
>
> Tomorrow we vote, tonight stpeter is finishing up the JEP
> docbook-derivative format.
>
> On the inital JIGs, here's who I'm guessing will be initially
> participating:
>
> *) Generic Conferencing
> - Dave Waite
> - ***
>
> *) File Transfer/OOB
> - Jeremie
> - ***
>
> *) Security
> - Thomas Muldowney
> - ***
>
> *) Standards Compliance
> - Michael Bauer
> - ***
>
> *) Text Formatting
> - Julian Missig
> - ***
>
> *) Browsing
> - Ryan Eatmon
> - Jeremie
> - Peter Millard
>
> *) Presence Management
> - ***
>
> *) Routing/Streams
> - Dave Smith
> - ***
>
> *) --- any more can be proposed next week using the JEP format and
> process
>
> What I'd like to see is at least one or two more names wherever there are
> ***'s (email me or the list), but only if you're planning on being a major
> contributor to that JIG.  If you just want to participate, I'll be setting
> up lists, etc, for each JIG this weekend.
>
> The fun commences :)
>
> Jer
>
>
>
> >
> > ---- Original Message ----
> > From: DJ Adams
> > Date: Thu 6/28/01 16:46
> > To: members at jabber.org
> > Subject: Re: [Foundation] jabber.com for president
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 02:21:19PM -0700, Bill Abbas wrote:
> > > On Thursday 28 June 2001 11:37, Jay Lorenzo wrote:
> > > > ultimately, the credibility of the
> > > > Foundation will be determined by the actions it takes.
> > >
> > > This is it in a nutshell.
> >
> > May I expand upon this and say just this:
> >
> > for goodness sake, I'd really like to get past this theoretical
> > discussion and get on with the real business of the Foundation.
> > If things do turn out to be wrongly balanced, wrongly voted,
> > wrongly whatever, then we can fix it at the time.
> >
> > No offence intended to anyone :-)
> >
> > dj
> > chomping at the bit(s)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Members mailing list
> > Members at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Members mailing list
> > Members at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members




More information about the Members mailing list