[Foundation] Jabber Name
dj.adams at pobox.com
Thu May 17 14:55:55 CDT 2001
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:38:58AM -0700, Harold E. Gottschalk Jr. wrote:
> 3) be worthy to control the future of what we call Jabber(it's just a name).
to me, it's not "just a name". That's part of the problem and the reason
for these discussions, I think. And I don't see them as pointless, to be
honest. I'm glad to be a part of a community (which includes the corporate
Jabber.com) that can discuss these things openly. Bravo to Jabber.com for
being open about it.
More information about the Members