[Foundation] Board Questions

Ben Schumacher ben at blahr.com
Thu Aug 8 21:56:26 CDT 2002

On 8 Aug 2002, Mike Lin wrote:
> > As DW first mentioned (and others followed) in their Council "debate"
> > question answers, trademark and other related issues are business related,
> > not technical, and therefore should be handled by the Board rather than
> > the Council.
> If the JSF gains control of the trademark, the criterion for how we
> allow it to be used will probably be technical. I assume it won't just
> be "Give us $$$ and you can use it". As is _supposed_ to be happening
> with JabberPowered, we'll create technical criterion for exactly what it
> means to be Jabber, and allow or disallow its use based on those
> technical criterion. I thought this was one of the basic assumptions
> related to the trademark, and so I'm really dismayed that so many people
> just dismissed the question.

I'll give on the point of technical standards on whether the trademark
will be used, however, I still maintain that dealing with how we get the
trademark under JSF control (as seems to be the ultimate goal, and point
of the question in the debate) should remain a business issue. I am
interested in seeing what you said on the trademark issue in your
response, but I have admittedly not finished reading everybody's answers,
particularly because some seemed real long and I was real busy at work
when they came in.

I'll make sure to get around to all of them before the vote next week,



More information about the Members mailing list