[Foundation] proposed agenda item: remote communications for meetings
Harold E. Gottschalk Jr.
heg at imissary.com
Wed Aug 21 17:14:58 CDT 2002
second
> -----Original Message-----
> From: members-admin at jabber.org
> [mailto:members-admin at jabber.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:12 PM
> To: members at jabber.org
> Subject: Re: [Foundation] proposed agenda item: remote
> communications for meetings
>
>
> Sorry, replace "voters" with "participants" in the proposal. So:
>
> ******
>
> RESOLVED that the following paragraph be added to Section 3.1
> of the JSF
> Bylaws:
>
> Subject to Board of Directors approval and compliance with
> applicable law, remote communication may include online text
> conferencing, provided that the conferencing system verifies
> the identity of participants to the satisfaction of the Secretary.
>
> ******
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
>
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> > OK, I know you're all getting sick of this (I am too), but
> I need to
> > propose one more voting item for the annual meeting agenda.
> I hereby
> > ask for people to second the following proposal:
> >
> > ******
> >
> > RESOLVED that the following paragraph be added to Section
> 3.1 of the
> > JSF
> > Bylaws:
> >
> > Subject to Board of Directors approval and compliance with
> applicable
> > law, remote communication may include online text conferencing,
> > provided that the conferencing system verifies the identity
> of voters
> > to the satisfaction of the Secretary.
> >
> > ******
> >
> > EXPLANATION for those who care... :)
> >
> > Item #4 on the agenda
> (http://www.jabber.org/discuss/2002-09-> 04.html)
> > addresses
> remote communication for the purpose of
> voting (Section 3.9
> > of the Bylaws), not for the purpose of official meetings of
> the JSF.
> > In order to hold official JSF meetings via groupchat, we
> need to amend
> > Section 3.1 of the Bylaws, and that is what the paragraph proposed
> > above will do for us. Without this proposed amendment, we
> could vote
> > via memberbot but we'd still have to hold the official meetings in
> > person or via conference call. Which is sub-optimal. So
> please help us
> > out by seconding this proposal by midnight MDT today (which is
> > actually 06:00 UTC tomorrow). Current and future JSf members will
> > thank you.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > --
> > Peter Saint-Andre
> > Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Members mailing list
> > Members at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
>
More information about the Members
mailing list