[Foundation] proposed agenda item: remote communications for
mass at akuma.org
Wed Aug 21 17:54:49 CDT 2002
I see two potential problems with this:
1) same as with voting, I don't see a reason to restrict this to just
text conferencing - any remote communication method which can verify the
identity of the participant could be acceptable.
2) I would like to see something which indicates that the system must
also meet the requirement for concurrency - if the remote communication
mechanism breaks, the meeting should not continue any more than if a
fire alarm went off at a physical meeting location.
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>Sorry, replace "voters" with "participants" in the proposal. So:
>RESOLVED that the following paragraph be added to Section 3.1 of the JSF
>Subject to Board of Directors approval and compliance with applicable law,
>remote communication may include online text conferencing, provided that
>the conferencing system verifies the identity of participants to the
>satisfaction of the Secretary.
More information about the Members