[Foundation] proposed agenda item: remote communications for meetings

[bauer at michaelbauer.com]

Well, by all means, come up with an alternative wording, get 8 seconds, 
and let's add it to the agenda.  

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, David Waite wrote:

> I see two potential problems with this:
> 1) same as with voting, I don't see a reason to restrict this to just 
> text conferencing - any remote communication method which can verify the 
> identity of the participant could be acceptable.
> 2) I would like to see something which indicates that the system must 
> also meet the requirement for concurrency - if the remote communication 
> mechanism breaks, the meeting should not continue any more than if a 
> fire alarm went off at a physical meeting location.
> 
> -David Waite
> 
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
> >Sorry, replace "voters" with "participants" in the proposal. So:
> >
> >******
> >
> >RESOLVED that the following paragraph be added to Section 3.1 of the JSF
> >Bylaws:
> >
> >Subject to Board of Directors approval and compliance with applicable law,
> >remote communication may include online text conferencing, provided that
> >the conferencing system verifies the identity of participants to the
> >satisfaction of the Secretary.
> >
> >******
> >
> >Peter
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Bauer     bauer at michaelbauer.com       http://www.michaelbauer.com