[Foundation] (no subject)
iain.shigeoka at messaginglogic.com
Thu Aug 22 00:08:36 CDT 2002
On 8/21/02 12:46 PM, "Adam Theo" <theo at theoretic.com> wrote:
> Up until Iain's posts here, I was not liking the closed ballot idea. I
> did think it would be best to have all votes open and viewable after the
> fact. But after reading Iain's argument about needing to protect people
> in the corporate world that we are trying to woo, I grudgingly accept a
> closed ballot. But how about also allowing voters to decide if their
> vote is made public or kept closed? closed by default.
Giving people the option of revealing their official vote creates just as
bad a situation. Imagine, I run some evil technology company and I want to
coerce votes. I tell people I'll pay them $10 if they vote a certain way
(or free licenses to my software). They of course have to prove it by
showing their vote publically. I also let it be known to all my employees
that if they don't vote for my agenda and prove it by showing their vote
publically, they can forget their X-mas bonuses.
If there is no way to know the official vote of any particular person these
strong arm tactics are much more difficult to carry out.
More information about the Members