[Foundation] Jabber (TM)

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Mon Mar 11 12:20:04 CST 2002

So where do we stand on this discussion?  It seems to have fizzled out a
bit with the recent voting/membership threads.  This is too important of
an issue to drown in that noise.


On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 11:07, Iain Shigeoka wrote:
> On 3/6/02 6:24 PM, "Mike Lin" <mikelin at MIT.EDU> wrote:
> > At the end of the discussion, then, I would very much like to see a
> > point-by-point document that clearly defines Jabber.com, Inc.'s policy,
> > which can be posted as a notice to all prospective members of the Jabber
> > developer community.
> I agree.  Perhaps we should start with your current list of points as a JEP
> or a document on the web somewhere and at least throw in the community's 2
> cents on it.  Then Jabber.com will have to weigh in and we can work from
> there.  The only timing issue for me would be that it may be more productive
> to do this either in parallel with, or after the whole Jabber Powered issue
> is addressed.  If we can define what is Jabber technology for Jabber
> Powered, we may have half the work done in figuring out a lot of the
> questions concerning Jabber trademarks...etc.
> -iain
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members

More information about the Members mailing list