[Foundation] today's JSF discussion
dizzyd at jabber.org
Wed Mar 20 13:49:03 CST 2002
On 3/20/02 12:39 PM, "Barry G. Lee" <bglee at sltscommunications.net> wrote:
> This agenda absolutely mystifies me.
> With all of the uproar of last week over membership and trade mark how can you
> ignore not having these two items on the agenda. Is this another attempt to
> hope that these two issues will go away.
*sigh* That's a big accusation to make. I would imagine that it's more of an
honest mistake by a very busy, under-appreciated JSF secretary.
> We at slts made an offer last Friday to help JSF pay for a trade mark review.
> This offer was made in good faith and there was no reply until one of the
> other members ( Iain ) asked if there had been a response. Then there was a
> response from Jeremie who I believe felt he needed to say something but there
> was no direction.
> The Trade Mark issue has been ongoing for a year and we for one had several
> voice conversations with Michael Bauer. He told us then that Jabber.com,Inc
> would be defending what he believed to be their Trade Mark.
> Because our offer to the JSF seems to have been rejected, slts would be
> pleased to set up a private conference chat with anybody that has an interest
> and would like to discuss this further.
Having a private conference isn't going to solve anything. Let's just get
this thing in the open. If the JSF board won't talk about it, don't just go
find a closet to discuss the issue in.
This is the way wars are started -- unfounded accusations and a blatant
attempt to build a backing by taking discussions underground.
More information about the Members