[Foundation] today's JSF discussion

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Mar 20 13:49:55 CST 2002

I'm sorry that you find this agenda mystifying. Unfortunately I'm at the
IETF meeting this week and I haven't been able to put much time into JSF
activities. Actually I'll be participating in a session about SIP/SIMPLE
at the time that the JSF discussion occurs but I didn't want to cancel our
regular discussion this week, especially since I was not able to attend
last week. So I basically copied over last week's agenda and added a few
items at the end.

Every week, the discussion agenda includes a period for open discussion.
It is there for a reason. As Jeremie posted a few days ago, he's been
talking with the members of the JSF board about your proposal. It has not
been swept under the rug and given Jeremie's post I don't think it is
accurate to say that your proposal "seems to have been rejected". If you'd
like to bring that up in the open discussion part of today's conference,
feel free to do so.


Peter Saint-Andre
email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/

On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Barry G. Lee wrote:

> This agenda absolutely mystifies me.
> With all of the uproar of last week over membership and trade mark how
> can you ignore  not having these two items on the agenda. Is this
> another attempt to hope that these two issues will go away.
> We at slts made an offer last Friday to help JSF pay for a trade mark
> review. This offer was made in good faith and there was no reply until
> one of the other members ( Iain ) asked if there had been a response.
> Then there was a response from Jeremie who I believe felt he needed to
> say something but there was no direction.
> The Trade Mark issue has been ongoing for a year and we for one had
> several voice conversations with Michael Bauer. He told us then that
> Jabber.com,Inc would be defending what he believed to be their Trade
> Mark.
> Because our offer to the JSF seems to have been rejected, slts would be
> pleased to set up a private conference chat with anybody that has an
> interest and would like to discuss this further.
> Please correspond to my personal e-mail bglee at sltscommunications.net
> Regards
> Barry
>  <http://www.myjabber.org/> Powered by myJabber!
> Barry G. Lee
> sltsCommunications <http://www.sltscommunications.net/>   
> 34 Bacchus Island Road
> Smiths Falls, Ontario, K7A 5B8
> Phone:613 284-0999
> Fax:613 284-0752
>  <mailto:bglee at sltscommunications.net> bglee at sltscommunications.net
> www.sltscommunications.net <http://www.sltscommunications.net/>  
> Instant Communications the way it should be!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: members-admin at jabber.org [mailto:members-admin at jabber.org] On
> Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:16 PM
> To: members at jabber.org
> Cc: council at jabber.org
> Subject: [Foundation] today's JSF discussion
> Yes, we will hold a JSF discussion today at the usual time.
> Unfortunately I'm at the IETF meeting in Minneapolis and I may not be
> able to participate in the meeting very fully after the first 30 minutes
> (also might be a few minutes late given the schedule here). Just FYI.
> The proposed agenda is here:
> http://www.jabber.org/discuss/2002-03-20.html
> Peter
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
> weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members

More information about the Members mailing list