[Foundation] Jabber (TM) and Jabber, Inc. press releases

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Fri Mar 22 19:17:59 CST 2002


This seems a bit ambiguous, could you clarify?  Have they been using it
verbally, or in written form?  As I read this now, it suggests more
written stuff is out there that uses just Jabber.  Is that correct?

--temas


On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 17:17, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> They've been doing that for a while. Personally I have encouraged all
> concerned (and have followed this recommendation when I write any copy for
> the company) to always use "Jabber, Inc." when referring to the company.
> However, not everyone sees it as I do.
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
> weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/
> 
> On 21 Mar 2002, Mike Lin wrote:
> 
> > So everyone take note of this.
> > 
> > Here is a blurb from Jabber, Inc.'s Bertelsmann press release: 
> > 
> > "About Jabber, Inc. 
> > Jabber, Inc. is the developer of the world's most widely used open
> > platform for..." 
> > 
> > And from today's Oracle 9i press release: 
> > 
> > "About Jabber, Inc. 
> > Jabber is the developer of the world's most widely used open flatform
> > for..." 
> > 
> > Also, from the preceding paragraph: 
> > 
> > "Jabber is one of the first companies to integrate wireless Instant
> > Messaging using the robust, open APIs of Oracle 9i Application
> > Server..." 
> > 
> > If this change was intentional, I find it to be a disturbing development
> > in light of our recent discussion, and I ask Jabber, Inc. to (1) explain
> > this apparent change in the use of the Jabber term and (2) again, codify
> > a clear, explicit, and unambiguous policy for the use of the Jabber
> > term. 
> > 
> > Mike Lin 
> > Jabber Council 
> > mikelin at mit.edu
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members





More information about the Members mailing list