[Foundation] a simple reform

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Fri Apr 11 10:37:31 CDT 2003


Yea and it doesnt have to badly impact the work of the council anyway since
I would think the ones doing a good job would probably get re-elected
anyway.

Richard

> only problem i can see with 6 months is a change in the by-laws maybe
> and the fact we'd have to have biannual general meetings. another
> problem might be that people would spend more time stumping than doing
> council stuff. but i do like the idea of 6 month terms for council
>
> Russell
>
> On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 11:14, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:11:04AM -0400, Russell Davis wrote:
> >
> > > if we did go forward with this and i can't see why not as it's seems
> > > reasonable then i'd like to also add a proposal to it that council
sits
> > > for 6 months rather than a full year -- board can stay at the year as
if
> > > i remember correctly board members don't need to be JSF members and
the
> > > business world works in yearly cycles anyway.
> >
> > Heh, well, 6 months seems to be about the maximum attention span for
> > some Council members. ;)
> >
> > Peter
> > _______________________________________________
> > Members mailing list
> > Members at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
>
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
>




More information about the Members mailing list