gleblanc at linuxweasel.com
Mon Apr 14 15:14:44 CDT 2003
On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 12:44, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> A GNOME contributor who read the public archives for this list let me
> know that GNOME is not a plutocracy but a pure meritocracy. I stand
> corrected and apologize for the error (I was confusing membership with
> the GNOME foundation's Advisory Board, which is non-voting).
> And actually, the GNOME Foundation's documents could be quite helpful to
> us regarding membership and such. Check these out:
If folks have questions on these, feel free to ask them here, I've been
working with and under them for a long time now. If there's anything
that you'd like more "official" word on, I can pass it along to the
GNOME Foundation Board.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20030414/c828c1a2/attachment.pgp
More information about the Members