[Foundation] Re: [Compliance] Compliance Team + JIG
iain at jivesoftware.com
Tue Jan 28 22:13:49 CST 2003
On 1/28/03 16:38, "Ed Coughlin" <ecoughlin at gollaborate.com> wrote:
> If I understand the approach (compliance JIG + compliance WG) I agree.
> Opening the discussion of compliance to the public (JIG) should result in
> better representation for the issues that matter to the widest demographic.
> Not to mention the increased possibility of finding more volunteers for the
> work. Having a WG that is smaller in number and accountable to the JSF
> should insure progress by avoiding the "everyone is responsible so no one is
> responsible" syndrome. Also, this would permit the WG to protect sensitive
> information proprietary to the JSF like product test results and information
> proprietary to the developer such as "early release" product info.
Agreed. Due to the general lack of 'outsider' interest in the marketing
team's activity and my general laziness, I propose that we let compliance
forge the way. If compliance meets with success and there is similar demand
for marketing to follow, we'll make the transition sometime in the future.
:) How's that for marketing-speak? :)
More information about the Members