[Foundation] Retraction: Call for Arbitration addition to the by-laws

[Thomas Muldowney]

+1

--temas


Ryan Eatmon wrote:
> 
> In speaking with Peter (again), he points out that this should probably 
> NOT be a by-law addition.  But rather an addition to JEP #1.
> 
> Are there any objections to this proposal being added to JEP #1 and 
> being made part of the JEP process?
>