[Foundation] UPDATE from Board Meeting

Russell Davis rkdavis at burninghorse.com
Thu Jul 31 16:28:33 CDT 2003

I am not saying they are available I am saying that it would be possible
for them to be examined and you try proving that they can't be seen. it
is not possible to prove a negative.


On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 17:17, Julian Missig wrote:
> On Thursday, Jul 31, 2003, at 17:14 US/Eastern, Russell Davis wrote:
> > it is unethical at the very minimum as it allows those who did not send
> > in their position papers to examine the papers of those that followed
> > the initial timetable and tailor their papers accordingly. Yes they
> > should not have access to them, but we all know things leak especially
> > within the JSF. If you have only recieved 2 position papers so far well
> > such is life and it is not close of business yet i am sure alot of
> > people were going to wait until the last possible moment.
> I'm just curious as to where you're seeing these position papers... ?
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members

More information about the Members mailing list