Meta-discussion (was Re: [Foundation] name change proposal)

Evan Prodromou evan at
Mon Jun 30 15:03:37 CDT 2003

>>>>> "PS" == Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at> writes:

    PS> Naturally, open discussion may result in alternative
    PS> proposals or different solutions to the perceived problem that
    PS> is outlined in the proposal. Such solutions are to be
    PS> welcomed, and it would benefit us all to think of solutions
    PS> that are not "either/or" but "both/and" if possible.

My parliajabbery knowledge not being what they could be, I have to
ask: what would be the process for this? Will the current proposal go
to a vote as it stands, no matter what, or are there chances to amend
it before it goes up for a vote?


Evan Prodromou
evan at

More information about the Members mailing list