Meta-discussion (was Re: [Foundation] name change proposal)

Iain shigeoka iain at shigeoka.com
Mon Jun 30 16:20:01 CDT 2003


I think that any reasonable changes can be incorporated. What did you 
have in mind? We're definitely interested in discussing the proposal 
and if useful, changing it before the final vote. I believe there is a 
limit on when vote items can be changed since we can't be changing 
what's being voted on while people are voting on it. Did you have 
anything specific in mind?

-iain

On Monday, Jun 30, 2003, at 13:03 US/Pacific, Evan Prodromou wrote:

>>>>>> "PS" == Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org> writes:
>
>     PS> Naturally, open discussion may result in alternative
>     PS> proposals or different solutions to the perceived problem that
>     PS> is outlined in the proposal. Such solutions are to be
>     PS> welcomed, and it would benefit us all to think of solutions
>     PS> that are not "either/or" but "both/and" if possible.
>
> My parliajabbery knowledge not being what they could be, I have to
> ask: what would be the process for this? Will the current proposal go
> to a vote as it stands, no matter what, or are there chances to amend
> it before it goes up for a vote?
>
> ~ESP
>
> -- 
> Evan Prodromou
> evan at prodromou.san-francisco.ca.us
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
>




More information about the Members mailing list