[Foundation] JSF == Jabber Standards Foundation?
cbas at rhymbox.com
Fri May 23 05:36:07 CDT 2003
+1 for XMPP Foundation (or something with XMPP)
I removed Jabber from my freeware/sharedsource software a month ago,
because *every time* someone asked me for a branded client I was told to
remove the word "Jabber" throughout the user interface.
Companies do not like to spend resources on building brand recognition
for another company. And neither do I, as a non-commercial member of
this comunity (and of the JSF).
The name "Jabber" served its purpose: to get where we are today. But
now there is a better choice: XMPP. It is a more generic name for a
more generic XML streaming protocol.
Now stop this bitching and vote!
johannes.wagener at gmx.net wrote:
>though I have not much time these weeks.
>I think it would make sense to rename the JSF to something like the "XMPP
>Foundation". XMPP is in fact the word in the mouth of the press talking about
>technical things. In articles about IM they might prefere Jabber. Therefor
>Jabber (as synonym for IM) is one way to use XMPP. Whatever the JSF should not
>only do the Jabber-Chat standarts but all XMPP.
>Conclusion: Jabber should be used for the chat systems based on XMPP in
>common, XMPP should be used for the standart in general.
>XMPP Foundation - the organisation for Jabber Standarts
>as a title for new JSF webpag would match best
More information about the Members