[Foundation] End Thread --> JSF == Jabber Standards Foundation?
iain at jivesoftware.com
Fri May 23 17:20:18 CDT 2003
On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 14:52 US/Pacific, Dave Smith wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> It seems to me that this argument/discussion is driven by three people
> who have something significant to gain stirring up discussion that has
> gone nowhere. Until we have a significant body of JSF members that are
> willing and capable of convincing and providing the necessary
> financial resources to make a name change happen, shall we just stop
> the conversation?
Granted. But the same could be said for the argument to keep the name
the same. :)
> We've all got more important things to attend to, and this entire
> thread is just eating bandwidth.
Actually i think this is very important, and needs to be discussed now.
If you don't, feel free to drop the thread in your kill file and ignore
us. You don't have to listen but we should be free to speak.
> When/if said body of JSF members emerges, I'd also be interested in
> some hard proof that the community will grow faster than it has, if we
> select new name. Until that proof is presented, you will simply not
> convince me that this is a good idea.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
More information about the Members