[Members] Where to Discuss JEPs the Right Way

Ralph Meijer jabberfoundation at ralphm.ik.nu
Thu Apr 8 04:12:19 CDT 2004

On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 04:12:40PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 12:58, Rottenberg, Hal wrote:
> > > Why not let the Council (or even the full membership) decide 
> > > whether the JEP bears any relevance, right at the start?
> > 
> > +1 and if not the full membership at least notify us of the council's
> > findings.
> Well, the Council is elected to get things done. Theory and reality may
> differ, but having the full membership decide these things will probably
> be even less efficient.

I agree with this.

> The introduction to a JEP is supposed to provide justification for the
> protocol. If it doesn't, that is a failing of the authors and perhaps
> the editor.

Also, it could be that it seemed more promising at first look than later on.
It seems no problem to me that JEPs get rejected here, but still be documented
and used outside of the JSF's realm.



More information about the Members mailing list