[Members] MOTION: JEP-0106 (JID Escaping)

Jacek Konieczny jajcus at bnet.pl
Fri Mar 26 08:47:09 CST 2004


On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:15:56AM -0000, Richard Dobson wrote:
> Now I hope you can see that things would not get double escaped, as we only
> need reuse the aspects that are useful to use (again just like we did with
> SOCKS5).

JID is not an URI, but will often be used in URI, e.g:
im:jajcus at jabber.bnet.pl

So, "example at example.com" in MSN network accessed via a transport
gateway would have JID e.g.: example%40example.com at msn.jabber.example.com
Which written as na URI would be:
	im:example%2540example.com at msn.jabber.example.com
This could be misleading. But you are right. This can be done and can be
usable if implemented properly.

Greets,
	Jacek



More information about the Members mailing list